The Life and Times of Rosie the Riveter (1980) Essay

The Life and Times of Rosie the Riveter (1980) - Essay Example The house was for the women while bringing money for the household needs was seen as a masculine job until an unexpected turn of event happened during the war, changed everything that was considered norm for centuries. Rosie the Riveter is a movie that shows these changes. When Japan bombed the Pearl Harbor in Hawaii, the United States was compelled to fight in the Second World War that broke in the dawn of the 1940s. men were recruited to wear uniforms and join the soldiers who valiantly fought for the sake of the country’s safety. Father, husbands and brothers left their jobs and became soldiers. Because of the need for more men in the army, the government did its best to convince all eligible men to brave themselves and serve the country in joining the most heroic responsibility of the male citizens, fighting the war. However, the nation was yet to be faced with another challenge- the lack of people to do the jobs the men left in the country. This called the attention of the government to the females and the propaganda to allure them to do masculine jobs was made. Posters of the image of a woman in bandana, showing her muscles with the caption, ‘we can do it’, was all over the country. Other attempts were quotations of the words of the president asking the women to join the war by doing the jobs that the men left. The works left in the country were as important as the works of the soldiers in the war because they needed planes, armaments and other materials produced in the country while the war was ongoing. This was the situation that was described to the women so that they will see their importance in the preservation of the country’s economy and safety. The husbands were afraid for this change, thinking their wives might not be able to do difficult jobs and the women were also nervous about this change. However, the necessity compelled everyone to do the tasks at hand. Women applied for jobs and learned the skills needed for

What Are the Advantages and Disadvantages of Using an Internal Change Research Paper

What Are the Advantages and Disadvantages of Using an Internal Change Agent - Research Paper Example Nevertheless, an organization can plan for change by preparing for it; however, change must be managed for it to succeed. Barriers to change are common and may lead to failure; they may include lack of enough resources, resistance, and lack of commitment, among others. As a result, change agents are necessary; they may be internal or external agents. However, they should be capable of motivating others and guarantee progress (Recklies, 2011). Change agents take up the duty of introducing and managing change. Internal change agents can vary form managers to employees. An internal change agent is advantageous compared to an external change agent; for instance, they are familiar with the organization’s culture, political system and history (Nelson & Quick, 2010, p.633). In addition, the internal change agents are likely to ensure that they introduce and manage change effectively because they will be affected by the results of the change, since they are part of the organization. C hange agents should be capable of fostering communication, commitment, and support in the change process. This paper will discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of internal change management. Advantages of internal change agents An organization decides to hire change agents for several reasons; the special skills and knowledge they possess, capability of management decisions, and the capability of leading an organization towards success through change management. Incase an organization decides to hire an internal change agent, below are some of the advantages. The change management process assists the organization in understanding the type of change and the reason for change, and as a result, reducing the fear of the unknown. Internal change agents are advantageous, since they can easily communicate with employees; as a result, trust is gained fast because they are part of the organization. Internal change agents mainly comprise of managers of an organization or its employees ; many organizations choose to use change agents with an aim of achieving a competitive advantage (Gilley, 2001, p.9). In addition, internal change agents are efficient, especially when emerging problems require the understanding of culture, procedures, structure, practices, and policies of an organization. An internal change agent is easily acceptable in the organization, as he in a position of understanding the organization better, hence being accountable for his decision, which is advantageous in reducing security risks. It is also possible for an internal change agent to be more time and cost efficient, since he is already familiar with the organization system. The knowledge of organizational politics, resources, and culture is also an added advantage as the change agent is committed to long-term success (Gilley, 2001, p.10). Moreover, an internal change agent can also work as an external agent especially when working in different departments. In addition, there is guaranteed co nfidentiality and security, since the change agent is part of the organization. This change agent may easily trust and respect fellow employees, as they are a team. Internal agents are likely to benefit from the easy accessibility of information, which is not the case with external agents. This may be an added advantage